Too many feature requests? Here's how to decide what to build first.
Every week you spend debating priorities is a week your roadmap doesn't move and the loudest request usually wins, not the right one.
The problem
You know the feeling: a stakeholder wants their feature "before end of quarter," support is flagging the same complaint for the third time, and your own backlog has 40 items you haven't looked at in months. Everything feels urgent. Nothing feels clearly ranked.
The hard part isn't lacking ideas, it's that you have no fast, defensible way to compare a sales request against a technical fix against a customer complaint. So you end up prioritizing by who asked loudest, or who asked last.
What, it's persisting?
Most teams try to fix this with a spreadsheet that gets abandoned after one use, or a gut-feeling ranking that falls apart the moment someone pushes back in a meeting.
There's a simple way to score and compare requests that have nothing in common on the surface, one that gives you an answer you can actually defend out loud, not just a feeling you can't explain.
what you're going to get?
This free framework walks you through it:
A way to score requests that are completely different from each other on the same scale
How to separate what's loud from what's actually high-impact
A method that gives you a number, not just a gut feeling — so you can defend it in the room
A 1-page ranking you can actually show stakeholders, not just keep in your head
Get the link
Your email is only used to send you this checklist. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
I'm a product manager sharing what I use to spot and fix broken user journeys.
This is a free resource, no strings attached.
Questions? pmworkflowlab@proton.me